What phase follows an inquiry after a research misconduct allegation?

After an inquiry into a research misconduct allegation, the next phase is an investigation. The inquiry phase serves as an initial assessment to determine if there is sufficient evidence to warrant a formal investigation. If the inquiry suggests that misconduct may have occurred, it triggers the investigation phase where a more in-depth examination of the evidence and circumstances is conducted.

During the investigation, a detailed analysis of the allegations takes place, which may include interviews with relevant individuals, a review of documents, and other evidence-gathering methods. The goal of this phase is to establish whether there is enough proof to confirm the allegations of misconduct and to provide findings and recommendations based on the investigation's outcomes.

The other phases mentioned—such as resolution, arbitration, and mediation—are not the immediate follow-ups to an inquiry. They may relate to dispute resolution or finalizing outcomes after an investigation has taken place, but the investigation itself is essential for handling the allegations and ensuring that due process is followed in addressing the misconduct claims.