What is the most appropriate process for research collaborators to use in determining which journal they should submit their work to?

The most appropriate process for research collaborators to determine which journal to submit their work to is to have discussions early on and throughout the project. This approach allows the research team to consider various factors that can influence their choice of journal, such as the scope of the journal, the target audience, and the journal's impact factor. By engaging in early discussions, collaborators can align their expectations and goals, ensuring that they choose a journal that best fits the focus and significance of their research findings.

Prior discussions can also help identify any specific requirements or preferences that may emerge as the research develops, thus avoiding potential conflicts later in the process. This proactive communication among team members fosters collaboration and ensures that all authors are on the same page regarding the publication strategy. It enhances the chances of acceptance by targeting a journal that is well-suited for the content and context of the research.

Other potential approaches, such as submitting to multiple journals or seeking guidance solely from the Technology Transfer Office, may lack the thorough consideration of project-specific factors and could lead to complications or misunderstandings regarding authorship and publication goals. Submitting to any journal without a strategic focus could also dilute the visibility of the research.