What action was taken by the IRB after the loss of subject records in the study involving housekeeping employees?

In the context of research ethics and the role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB), the chosen response reflects a proactive approach to mitigate risks associated with data loss. When subject records are lost, particularly in studies involving sensitive information, it is crucial to implement changes that will enhance data security and ensure the protection of participants' privacy in future iterations of the study.

The decision to require electronic record transmission aligns with modern practices that prioritize data integrity and security. This change would help minimize the risk of losing sensitive information again by utilizing more secure methods of data management. Electronic records are typically easier to store, back up, and encrypt compared to paper records, thereby reducing the likelihood of data loss due to physical mishaps.

In light of this action, the other responses do not adequately address the root cause of the issue or implement long-term solutions to prevent future occurrences. Canceled studies or rescheduled interviews would not solve the fundamental problem regarding record keeping and data security. Additionally, instead of compensating subjects after a record loss, it is more appropriate to establish protocols that protect participants in the first place. Thus, focusing on protocol changes demonstrates a commitment to ethical standards and the proper conduct of research.